The New York Times says it “remains unclear what motivated the gunman who opened fire at a Christmas market in Strasbourg.”
It remains unclear what motivated the gunman who opened fire at a Christmas market in Strasbourg, officials said, as the police continue an intensive search for the attacker https://t.co/BVuv5X8KRU
— The New York Times (@nytimes) December 12, 2018
Which is interesting, because in the VERY SAME ARTICLE they reveal what seems to be an ABUNDANTLY CLEAR MOTIVE:
second paragraph pic.twitter.com/CxOrKKxiY1
— Griswold Christmas Vacation (@HashtagGriswold) December 12, 2018
Rémy Heitz, the Paris prosecutor, who handles terrorism investigations nationwide, said at a news conference in Strasbourg on Wednesday that witnesses had heard the attacker yell “Allahu akbar,” or “God is great” in Arabic, and that the targets and the suspect’s profile justified the opening of a terrorism investigation.
His “motive” was Islamic extremism.
Where’s the mystery here, NYT?
Golly gee, if only we had some kind of clue
— EvanC.Gangstar🌟 (@pinkestXfloyd) December 12, 2018
“Motive remains unclear” lol
— Rice with a B (@curby_brice) December 12, 2018
Hmmmmm pic.twitter.com/YHa7uMfQdw
— Alex (@SeattleCoug88) December 12, 2018
We may never know. Unless we read two paragraphs down in the linked article.
— AUCʜɪᴢᴀᴅ (@AUChizad) December 12, 2018
It’s amazing how this mass shooting has basically disappeared out of the news cycle within 18 hours.
— Unaccountable BureauCat (@UnAcctBureaucat) December 12, 2018
Well… wrong narrative, soooo…
I mean I may not be Sherlock Holmes but it’s pretty obvious Climate Change is to blame
— rebel millennial (@patriotic_giant) December 12, 2018
HA!