

The 2020 crowd is filling up quickly. Everybody mocked the Republican Party for having so many candidates during the last primary (what was the final number– 17?), but I’m starting to think that Democrats could beat us. So far, they have Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, Julian Castro, John Delaney, Tulsi Gabbard, John Hickenlooper, Beto O’Rourke, Amy Klobuchar, Jay Inslee, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Andrew Yang and some woman named Marianne Williamson. We might as well add Joe Biden to that list, because it’s pretty much a lock.
They could easily surpass 17 candidates.
I would never vote for any of them for a number of reasons, but there’s one reason that surpasses them all.
They’re all huge supporters of abortion. And not just “abortion” abortion. These people are utterly incapable of condemning late-term abortion, AKA, the worst of all abortions. While all abortions are terrible, defending late-term abortion takes one to a new level of horrendous entirely.
Did you hear that? If a woman 8 months pregnant decides that she doesn’t want her baby for WHATEVER reason, she can have an abortionist stick scissors in the base of her child’s neck and end his or her life. That’s her “choice,” according to Beto.
Could this extreme stance pose a problem for Democrats in 2020? Some Democratic activists seem to think so.
Kristen Day, executive director of Democrats for Life, said that her party’s embrace of late-term abortion may win fundraising dollars from mega-donors like Planned Parenthood and NARAL, but will alienate voters come the general election.
“This abortion position is the most extreme it has ever been,” she told the Washington Free Beacon. “They’re all fighting for the abortion lobby vote and that could turn around and hurt them all in the general election.”
“Safe, legal, and rare is something most pro-life Democrats could accept, but paying for abortion up to nine months with federal funds is extreme,” Day added. “When you talk about abortion extremism you’re going to lose votes particularly the one-third of Democrats who identify as pro-life and think life is worth protecting.”
In other words, there are some voters within the Democratic Party who won’t stand for candidates who actively embrace late-term abortions.
Do you think candidates are even considering this? I hate asking that question. I hate that some of the candidates would consider softening their position to satisfy voters instead of changing it because IT’S THE RIGHT THING TO DO.
What do you make of this?
h/t Free Beacon