Gavin Newsom Craps On The Second Amendment But Won’t Give Up His Personal Security

Ahhhh, Democrat politicians. It’s like a well-written script at this point. We know it SO WELL. If you’ve actually been paying the least bit of attention and have even the tiniest shred of critical thinking skills, that is. These jackholes are SO. FREAKING. PREDICTABLE.
In the latest edition of Let’s-See-How-Hypocritical-and-Elitist-Gavin-Can-Be-Today, we have the Governor of California moaning and whining about the second amendment in the Constitution, calling it a “suicide pact.”
Mmmmmkay there, Skippy.
“The second amendment is a suicide pact,” @GavinNewsom tells us tonight on the @CBSEveningNews. #MontereyPark #GovernorNewsom pic.twitter.com/I5kyx9O1AU
— Norah O'Donnell 🇺🇸 (@NorahODonnell) January 24, 2023
I think it bears repeating that dudes who WEREN’T beta-manlets like Gavin up there created the Constitution, so when they wrote the Second Amendment with great intellect and foresight, they understood exactly what they were writing and why:
“A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
Bless Gavin’s slicked-back heart. He just doesn’t understand the whole “shall not be infringed” thing. And he suuuuuure is taking advantage of firearms and armed security for HIM. His life is IMPORTANT, dontchaknow. He just doesn’t want them for YOU. He doesn’t want the “right of the PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS.” He just wants the elitists like HIM to be able to have them….you know, to protect him and his ilk to be protected from riff raff like you. Us dirty peasants.
I wonder why this “journalist” didn’t ask him why he doesn’t give up his armed security? Why Nancy Pelosi doesn’t? Why ANY OF THESE Democrat politicians don’t do that?
Why IS THAT?
Remember this clip when he makes a run for the highest office in the land in 2024. Because he is a hypocritical, power-hungry, socialist windbag who will stop at nothing to squelch your rights, and he has no intention of giving up any of those rights himself. Make no mistake.
You know it’s coming, y’all.
<shudder>
Keep Reading
New Passport, Who Dis? Online Passport Applications Are Coming in 2027
Trump Says What We’re All Thinking Regarding Obama’s Fantasy of Women Running Everything
Judge Judy Isn’t Messing Around When It Comes to the U.S.
What the Flock? Indiana Police Officers Caught Using Flock Cameras Inappropriately
Join the Conversation
Share your perspective and reply to other readers.
Create your account
Create your free Chicks on the Right account without leaving this article.
Welcome back
Log in and continue the conversation on this page.
2 Comments
It’s not a suicide pact, it’s Mutually Assured Destruction. It’s far less likely that people will engage in violent acts when they know the risk is their life than if we were to go back to a natural defense mechanism where the physical attributes of the person determine victory.
Newsom and his ilk are merely exhibiting a desire common to all aspiring tyrants. They who seek power over others have always sought to deprive the common man of his means of self-defense. The urge is visible all the way back to classical Rome. It was strong throughout the Middle Ages. It persisted in pre-American Revolution Europe. Perhaps the most revolutionary thing the Founders did was to enshrine the right to keep and bear arms in our Supreme law.