JUST IN: Schiff’s Ukraine Whistleblower Agrees To Take Questions From Republicans Under ONE Condition


The Ukraine Whistleblower who met with Schiff and his staff before submitting a complaint is now demanding a “safe space.”  The Whistleblower has now agreed to take questions from the Republicans but ONLY IF he/she can do so in writing and NOT IN PERSON.

Hmmmmm, so I suppose that is a financial bummer for the Ukraine Whistleblower, because the Democrats, now won’t be launching a GoFund me account on their behalf to raise a million or two for “self-protection” from the public.

Last year around this time, I don’t recall the Democrats demanding a safe space for the identity of Dr. Christine Blasey Ford. In fact, Feinstein and cronies worked very hard to make sure that Ford never knew about the Republican’s offer for her complete safety and privacy. Due to the sensitivity of the case, Chuck Grassley specifically offered to fly to California to meet with Ford near her home to securely and privately conduct a hearing. Still, despite her extreme fear of air travel, she made the trip to D.C. anyway. Because, then, the Democrats had no problem placing their star witness and well-rehearsed Kavanaugh Whistleblower on the center of the world stage.

So what has changed in this case, roughly a year later? Unlike the Kavanaugh case, this time, we have established evidence. Evidence proving that Schiff and his staff had direct contact with the Whistleblower before they filed a complaint. This ridiculousness demands answers and not for the Democrats to keep hidden behind closed doors.

Never fear, we have more BullShiff incoming. First, I’ll cover a few soundbites from Schiff’s October 13th interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation:”

Given that we already have the call record, we don’t need the whistleblower who wasn’t on the call to tell us what took place during the call,” Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA) said in an interview on CBS’s “Face the Nation.”

Are you as dizzy as I am after reading that statement? And, Trump is now “threatening” the Whistleblower?…. I think he asked, “where is the Whistleblower…? Apparently, that is a threat:

Before the president started threatening the Whistleblower … we were interested in having the Whistleblower come forward. Our primary interest right now is making sure that that person is protected,” he added.

Now that the Whistleblower has his/her own legal counsel, here’s what they released to the public on Sunday, November, 3rd:
Whistleblower attorney Mark Zaid made the announcement on Sunday via Twitter, writing, “Our legal team offered GOP direct opportunity to ask written questions of #whistleblower. Recent GOP messaging, led by President Trump (incl this morning), has been to highlight original #WBer & demand disclosure of identity.”
However, there is a potential problem with the offer: the Whistleblower is only offering to submit answers in writing and has not offered to testify in front of Republicans.
“So we have offered to @DevinNunes, Ranking HPSCI Member, opportunity for Minority to submit through legal team written questions to WBer. Qs cannot seek identifying info, regarding which we will not provide, or otherwise be inappropriate,” Zaid concluded.
A Republican source connected to Democrats’ impeachment inquiry said on Sunday, “I don’t think we will settle for scripted interrogatories. We need a full accounting of his actions and how this was orchestrated.”
Republican lawmakers have noted that one of the things they want to press the whistleblower on is his connections to Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff, since it was revealed that Schiff’s staff had contact with the whistleblower prior to the whistleblower filing the complaint and, as a Washington Post fact-check concluded, Schiff lied about it.

Here’s the bottom line: “Democrats don’t want their anti-Trump CIA “whistleblower” to testify. They know if America finds out his liberal background, ties to the Obama deep state, and far-left anti-Trump work history, their case will be ruined.”

And legally, according to Former US Attorney General, a whistleblower is not guaranteed anonymity, he/she does need to publicly testify and be open to cross-examination.

It’s quite clear that Schiff is very well connected to this Whistleblower. So closely connected, one might assume the Whistleblower is a reflection of Schiff himself. All humor aside, Schiff seems ultimately married to the safety of this Whistleblower. So, in order to keep him/her safe, I’m sure Schiff will gladly step up to be a fact witness himself. In fact, it’s looking like he won’t have a choice in the matter.

Listen to "Mock and Daisy's Common Sense Cast" on Spreaker.