As I mentioned a few days back, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand tweeted about the “future” she wants:
Our future is:
IntersectionalPowered by our belief in one another.
And we’re just getting started.
— Kirsten Gillibrand (@SenGillibrand) December 5, 2018
So here’s a question… if the future is “female,” then are you truly advocating we believe “in one another?” Because it sounds to me like you believe in women over men.
Don Jr. has a question, too.
Good to know. My girls will be excited about this. When is it appropriate to let my boys (9, 7 and 6 years old) that there’s no future for them?
Not sure this is a winning platform but you be you. https://t.co/pCu0GbPyAi
— Donald Trump Jr. (@DonaldJTrumpJr) December 5, 2018
As a daughter, a sister, and a fiancee, I don’t WANT a “female” future. I want a future where we’ll judge people on their talents and the content of their character, not on their sex.
Is that too much to ask?!
Of course, the lib reactions are as gross as ever:
“When you’re accustomed to privilege, equality feels like oppression.”
— Camilla Rose (@CamillaRoasted) December 6, 2018
Explain to me how “the future is FEMALE” promotes equality.
Yep, your boys have it so tough. pic.twitter.com/Wbs0BDdGdx
— Margie (@Baloodancer2) December 6, 2018
You just don’t get it, do you?
I don’t know – raising adulterers = non future
— Maine Mom (@MaineMomof3) December 6, 2018
Tough to answer. If you lose all your money when you’re in prison and they have to really learn on their own they’ve got a chance
— Mike Bauer (@Door_Gunner) December 6, 2018
— Shane Keena (@smkeena49) December 6, 2018
If you raise your boys to be just like you and grandpa there is no future for them. Don’t you get that by now? You aren’t good people.
— Your Outer Voice with Carrie Mahoney (@youroutervoice) December 6, 2018
Don’t you get it by now, Carrie? You are INSANE.
So incredibly pathetic.