Abortion Isn’t Enough Anymore… Some Libs Want Infanticide Now, Too

This is unbelievable. I was having a hard time believing it wasn’t a hoax… but it doesn’t appear to be…

A student from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville thinks parents should have the choice to kill children up to the age of 2…

His argument is sickening. First, this scumbag has obviously not been around many two year olds (thank GOD!) because they certainly CAN communicate! And they WILL. ALL. DAY. LONG. Two years olds won’t STOP communicating.

Anyone who compares a two-year old’s communication skills to those of a TREE has either never seen a human baby or is HIGH.

But secondly, and most importantly, babies and toddlers can be killed because they CAN’T COMMUNICATE??!!?! Um… many adults cannot speak for one reason or another. Does this imbecile advocate allowing for their murder, too?

Seriously. If “talking” is his parameter, than does he believe in the killing of any and ALL people with disabilities that leaves them unable to speak? I’d REALLY like to ask him that.

According to Students For Life:

Last month, Students for Life of America’s Appalachian Regional Coordinator, Brenna Lewis, recorded an encounter with a pro-choice student, who sought to justify his support for infanticide of two-year-olds. The student attends University of Tennessee, Knoxville.

The student claimed that because a two-year-old may not be sentient, that the two-year-old baby does not have the same right to life. He also compared its rights to that of a tree. Because the baby cannot talk, for example, the student argued that it did not have the same rights.

We are SHOCKED that anyone would say this… but… is it even all that far-fetched?

This is hardly the first time pro-choice activists have sought to justify infanticide. We know, for example, that Princeton professor Peter Singer has long championed killing babies born with disabilities, and has also justified killing babies up to two years of age. He said, for example, “Human babies are not born self-aware, or capable of grasping that they exist over time. They are not persons.”

In fact, a Planned Parenthood lobbyist openly admitted the group’s support for ‘post-birth abortion’, which is just infanticide. Falling back on the same arguments of “women’s choice”, the Planned Parenthood lobbyist defended the right to kill a born, breathing baby.

This breaks my heart….

Peter Singer says that babies “are not persons.”

I personally question the humanity of anyone who can look at a baby and not realize they are the very purest form of people.

Completely untainted by the evil of the world. A tiny little gift in a perfect package.

If you don’t see that… If you look at a baby and think nothing of their MURDER… YOU are not a person. YOU are a monster.