This might be useful in just refreshing your memory on all the times that Hillary “Voice For All Women” Clinton made other women’s lives hell on earth. Most of them are because Bill’s a relentless horndog, but at least one had absolutely nothing to do with Hillary’s husband or trying to salvage her political marriage. Which just goes to show that Hillary only cares about women (and children and minorities and anyone else on this planet) as long as doing so gets her elected.
Let’s start with Juanita Broaddrick – and if you missed it, Mock and Daisy interviewed her on the radio last week. Juanita was raped by Bill Clinton (okay, okay, fine – “allegedly” raped) in the late 1970s. By Juanita’s own admission, she wasn’t political at all and she only wanted to bring some attention to the plight of people in nursing homes –
Back in 1978, I was not ever into politics before. But here comes this Bill Clinton who is extremely charismatic. We were just so ready for a change in Arkansas, so I volunteered to be in his campaign. I met him when he was making a tour of nursing homes and businesses in this area. He came to my nursing home and we were all just so proud that he came there and so interested in his campaign. While he was there, I was trying to explain to him the situation that the nursing homes were in at the time… We were not being reimbursed properly, and he seemed very interested.
Juanita was a young woman who believed that elected Bill Clinton for governor would help the people that she worked with in nursing homes and she put her trust in him enough to help his campaign. And, as she spoke about in her interview with Mock and Daisy, Bill took disgusting advantage of that –
And how did Hillary treat Juanita? Well, quoting against from the radio interview –
We were about to leave [a fundraising event] when the Clintons came in… Just as they came in, the man who had driven then there… came over to me and said “The topic of conversation from the airport was entirely about you.” And that sort of alarmed me. I turned to [my friend] and said “We need to go.” And that’s when [the Clintons] walked in.
Hillary walked straight to me. She hadn’t been in that home more than 20 seconds before somebody directed her and pointed to me. She came straight to me and had this huge smile on her face, telling me “I’m so happy to meet you. I just want you to know how appreciative we are for everything that you do for Bill.”
I just sort of nodded and was going to turn and get out of there. [Hillary] grabbed hold of my arm and my hand, and she pulls me close to her. And this smile fades to the most horrible frown and she says “Do you understand everything you do?” And she was squeezing my arm! I extracted her hands from me and we left.
Un-freaking-believable. And feminists have the AUDACITY to defend Bill’s actions?? Or dismiss Hillary’s response to it?
Other women who’ve come forward are Gennifer Flowers, a woman who Hillary called “trailer trash” and a “cabaret singer who doesn’t have much of a resume to fall back on.” Not to mention the time Hillary said she’d love to cross-examine Flowers and “crucify her.” Monica Lewinsky, who Hillary called a “narcissistic loony toon.”
Oh, and can’t forget “bimbo eruptions!”
And then there’s Paula Jones, who told of Arkansas state troopers finding women for Bill, but Hillary insisted that Team Clinton has to “destroy her stories” –
Hillary was fully on board. When a rock groupie alleged that a state trooper approached her on Governor Clinton’s behalf, Hillary said “we have to destroy her story.”
[…]
After Bill’s election, state troopers told of how they had procured women for him, and one of the procured was Paula Jones. When she came forward, she was abused as trailer-park trash, even though her story of a gross come-on by Clinton in a hotel room was completely credible. Hillary had as much interest in forcefully rebutting allegations of sexual misconduct as Bill did. Hillary apparently didn’t spare a moment’s thought why her husband the governor would have wanted a private meeting with a 24-year-old state employee. She interviewed superlawyer Bob Bennett to handle the Jones sexual-harassment suit and insisted on a hardline defense. Bennett spread rumors of nude pictures of Jones and had another lawyer subpoena men to try to find evidence of Jones’s alleged promiscuity.
Hillary enabling Bill’s abuse and promiscuity is bad enough. But then there’s my “favorite” (by which I mean I want to throw up every time I hear about it) – which is the criminal trial over the rape of a twelve-year-old girl and Hillary – as a newly-minted lawyer – defended the accused rapist and got him a lighter sentence for his disgusting crime by claiming the girl had a tendency to “seek out older men” –
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Clinton, then named Hillary D. Rodham, wrote in the affidavit. “I have also been informed that she has in the past made false accusations about persons, claiming they had attacked her body. Also that she exhibits an unusual stubbornness and temper when she does not get her way.”
Clinton also wrote that a child psychologist told her that children in early adolescence “tend to exaggerate or romanticize sexual experiences,” especially when they come from “disorganized families, such as the complainant.”
The victim vigorously denied Clinton’s accusations and said there has never been any explanation of what Clinton was referring to in that affidavit. She claims she never accused anyone of attacking her before her rape.
Yep. Hillary’s ALLLLL for women and children. Unless she sees you as a stepping stone or a hindrance for her getting power. Then you’re just a pawn to be destroyed.
And even the New York Times is admitting the truth of these accusations! Though, given they’re still firmly in her camp, they don’t seem to mind very much. Here’s Red Dawn’s take –
NYT goes on to say that Hillary was put in a difficult position. And obviously, being married to a constant cheater/rapist/all around man skeeze isn’t exactly easy, but she defended his behavior. She didn’t stick with him because she was a faithful wife who saw the best in him. It was about her and her chance to attain political power. That’s always been her objective.
Here’s what I don’t understand. NYT basically admits that Hillary Clinton enabled her husband and did the complete OPPOSITE of what a woman devoted to female empowerment would do. She threatened and intimidated other women. She tried to silence them. But for some reason, the editorial board happily endorsed her, writing, “Mrs. Clinton’s record of service to children, women and families has spanned her adult life.”
So, the next time Team Hillary gets all up in Donald Trump’s face for his comments about women’s looks or their weight – just remember what Hillary’s done to rape victims who she perceives as a threat to her lifelong quest for power. And then think if you want the First Woman President to be someone who not only turns a blind eye to these injustices, but even enables the perpetrators to continue their activities against innocent women.
The fact that Hillary Clinton is held up as a champion of women and hold the distinction as being the first woman nominated by a major party for president and is this close to being the leader of the free world makes me physically, mentally, emotionally, and spiritually sick. In every way I can be sickened by this, I am.
Never Hillary. Ever.