I have no idea how I missed this phenomenon, but apparently a couple months ago a new Twitter campaign was started by some feminists called #GiveYourMoneyToWomen. The purpose? To basically balance out the fact that men are beneficiaries of the patriarchy, and that they make more money than women (yes, feminists are still screeching that nonsense). The hashtag campaign is supposed to suggest/encourage/demand that men hand over their money to women. You know, to make life fair. Or something.
My sister sent me this article, which was a recap of an interview with the crazy beyotches who started this hashtag campaign, and I am still trying to recover from reading it, because it’s freaking INSANE.
They’re suggesting that women deserve compensation (read: reparations) for their unpaid labor – and when I say labor, I mean stuff like being smiled at without giving consent to be smiled at.
No joke.
So the next time some well-intentioned feminist asks you why you’re NOT a feminist, and the next time they try to say, “Of course you’re a feminist! Feminists believe in equality!” then please show them this post, so that they can begin to understand that the reason women like us run like the wind away from the label of feminist is because of stupid hashtag campaigns demanding men pay us for NO FREAKING REASON.
Here are a couple of key quotes from Lauren Chief Elk-Young Bear, Yeoshin Lourdes, and Bardot Smith, who explain the campaign. (Incidentally, if you ever meet these women, RUN LIKE THE WIND.)
Yeoshin: I realized I was depleting myself dealing with men both at work and otherwise. My career trajectory has almost always depended on male-dominated work, where I was constantly subject to unwanted male gaze and male emotion. It’s demoralizing and exhausting, and it’s the perfect catalyst for mental health problems, which then can jeopardize employment altogether. And not only are women’s wages incommensurate with our job descriptions in any given male-dominated field, but we receive no compensation for any of the other bullshit that is automatically attached to the job simply because we are women. I’ve never gotten paid to get ogled and flirted with every single day in the office. Nothing about that is sustainable as an avenue for survival, let alone achievement of financial security.
I noticed a similar pattern in my personal life, where men who alleged make my life better than before, consistently made it worse. Continuing to invest myself into relationships on the off-chance men would one day start carrying their own weight, became unrealistic and difficult to justify. And so this has been hugely life-changing for me in that I’m no longer beholden to anyone who does not directly and immediately support my success and well-being, and I can be compensated for any and all time and energy asked of me, on my own terms.
Lauren: The specific hashtag developed when I went to go visit Yeoshin, and being in person with her to discuss the exploitation of women on a broad spectrum. This came in the days following anger at the “wife bonus,” and we just started talking about all types of uncompensated labors, in the form of sexual labor, emotional labor, physical labor, educational labor [particularly what we’ve provided in a number of ways digitally], all of this is without monetary return. It was a Friday and I decided that men didn’t need to recommend us for a #FollowFriday, they needed to demonstrate their appreciation by making a payment to our PayPal accounts. “Give your money to women” was explicitly said out loud and we agreed that needed to be the hashtag. “Put up your PayPals, ladies!!!” followed as the initial tweet, and then it just exploded.
Lauren: As Bardot has mentioned this isn’t about us needing to be paid more in the patriarchal-dominated wage system, or “wanting cash for nothing”, it’s about not being paid for what is wanted and desired from us, and now monetizing that.
Yeoshin: And of course, the response from men has been predictably polarized. Many men paid women right away. In some cases, not knowing how to repay us for their consumption of our time, energy, and intellectual labor, had been a source of guilt; so this type of exchange presented them with an opportunity to finally balance the scales and affect some welcome relief from the burden of indebtedness. And then there was the onslaught of male rage. The prevailing sentiment seems premised on a misconception: many men declare women do not deserve money for no reason. To that, I would say I agree: we only require recompense for any and all benefits they reap from women, including taking up our time and energy for any and all reasons. If they seek nothing, then there is nothing to discuss. And that should also mean they never interact with or go near any woman, ever again. Which is perfectly fine with me. So, why such rage, then?
Here’s the amazing part, you guys. PEOPLE ARE PAYING THEM. Check these quotes out:
Yeoshin: On Facebook, people who click on profiles are mostly men, and people whose profiles are clicked on are mostly women. So my having a personal account on Facebook makes me a product for Facebook to sell to men. And now that site is worth $250 billion. Likewise, nightlife venues thrive by getting women to participate in their business operations, and they do so by waiving or discounting cover charges or otherwise marketing to women specifically. Women are the product these establishments are selling to men, who then arrive and spend heavily just to be in the same room as women. But I’ve never received a check from Facebook or any club for my business development services. So, instead of wasting my time generating revenue for corporate entities that aren’t paying me, I’d rather make my social interactions profitable to me.
Bardot: And since this is all happening on mainstream platforms, we’re seeing broadly that men are just approaching women online at all times for all reasons, expecting to be accommodated or humored or entertained or fought with or whatever it is. It’s not trivial. And it’s not without cost. So I started just using that as my own practice: my boundary is that if you want to talk to to me at all, you have to pay. Period.
Yeoshin: Some women have been swift to recognize that their own consumption also comes at a direct cost to other women. A handful of women, mostly white women, have sent me money, expressing gratitude for knowledge and insights I’ve shared that have impacted their lives. A select few white women have acknowledged their status as beneficiaries of my intellectual labor specifically resulting from racialized marginalization at the hands of white women. So they paid. It’s an important and significant gesture. This is capitalism: words and white guilt don’t improve my life, but capital does.
And I suppose, that even though it’s insane, the people who are actually sending these weirdos money ARE engaging in capitalism. It’s supply and demand, after all. Those people are complete morons, of course, but the same argument could be made for a lot of people making a lot of really dumb purchases.
Here’s the thing. These harpies are basically whining that they should be paid for existing. They’re suggesting that they are consumed, but that they themselves never consume, which is absurd. You can’t tell me for one second that these chicks haven’t been "accommodated by, or humored or entertained or fought with" by men. Have they ponied up?
Women like the #GiveYourMoneyToWomen chicks give women and feminism a bad name. When women are branded as bitchy, irrational divas, they are the reason. They consider life itself to be an injustice against them.
They need to learn that life doesn’t owe them jack sh*t, and neither do men. Suck it up, buttercups.