NYT Opinion is that Klobuchar and Warren are the Democrats’ top choices for President in the 2020 race.
— New York Times Opinion (@nytopinion) January 20, 2020
“The incumbent president, Donald Trump, is clear about where he is guiding the Republican Party — white nativism at home and America First unilateralism abroad, brazen corruption, escalating culture wars, a judiciary stacked with ideologues and the veneration of a mythological past where the hierarchy in American society was defined and unchallenged.”
Isn’t it comical that on the very weekend that the liberal elite march for women’s rights, the editorial board for the New York Times endorsed the only two women candidates still running for President?
The editorial board is made up of 17 members of whom SEVEN are women. Am I the only one to see the hypocrisy of this moment?
We are to believe that women are being held back by our president, and yet we have two women being endorsed by the New York Times.
The New York Times says that “Democrats must decide which of their two models would be most compelling for the American people and best suited for repairing the Republic.”
Warren’s plan for repairing the republic includes all the typical socialist agendas, “taking from the rich to give to the poor.” Klobuchar, who has the personality of day-old bread, wants to help rid the country of all its climate change problems. That just sounds like depending on foreign energy again.
As I look at the Democratic field, I can’t help but think, “Is this really the best the left has to offer?” There is not a single original, functional idea among the running field that doesn’t include the exact blueprint of putting our country into another recession.