So, according to the sourcelink, 25 year old Chelsea Cheyenne Becker, MOTHER OF THREE, gave birth this past September to a stillborn baby who tested positive for toxic levels of meth.
Chelsea’s other three children were also born with meth in their systems, and she has lost custody of all of them (they are aged 4, 3, and 1).
Chelsea lives in California, where abortions appear to happen through the third trimester, and at least according to this, they happen with no consequence. From the sourcelink:
We provide assistance to women in California with late term abortions, third trimester abortions, abortion after 27 weeks, maternal indication abortions, fetal indication abortions, and birth control.
So, had Chelsea simply gone to that abortion clinic some weeks before her due date, she could have murdered her baby with the full blessing and permission of the state. But because she opted for the meth route, she’s now charged with murder, because after the autopsy of her baby was completed, and meth was discovered at toxic levels, the death of her baby was ruled a homicide. And now Chelsea’s on the hook for first-degree murder, with bail set at FIVE MILLION DOLLARS.
If only she’d murdered her baby the legal way, amirite?
And there’s really no telling at what point in her pregnancy the baby died.
The levels of methamphetamine in this baby’s system were such high levels, even for an adult, so we believe that she was using almost the entire time that she was pregnant,’ Detective Sgt. Justin Vallin of the Hanford Police Department told KGPE.
Cops say Becker admitted to using meth during her pregnancy right up until just a few days before giving birth.
I genuinely don’t understand why this is an issue. I mean, if women want to kill their unborn babies, it’s their choice, as I understand. At least, this is what pro-abortion activists have been screeching for decades now. “Her body, her choice!” Chelsea wanted to put meth in her body, and so screw her unborn baby. That baby was a parasitic clump of cells anyway. Chelsea was simply exercising her right to bodily autonomy, and choosing how to manage her own reproductive health.
Am I pro-choicing right?
Pro-abortion advocates simply can’t get around how barbaric their position truly is.