Jake Tapper recently grilled Georgia’s Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams on her stance on mass gun confiscation.
“When you were a state lawmaker in 2016, you co-sponsored a bill that would have allowed Georgia state authorities to take away so-called assault weapons from current gun owners,” Jake Tapper said.
“Most similar bans would grandfather in existing weapons of that sort, semiautomatic rifles that are called assault weapons. So, is that your current position, that law-abiding gun owners in Georgia should have to give up those weapons, if authorities deem it necessary?”
She… wants to “start conversations.”
“In the state of Georgia, you introduce legislation to start conversations,” Abrams said. “I am happy to work with the legislature to figure out how we make an assault weapons ban work.”
So you DO want to ban, and CONFISCATE, these supposed “assault weapons.” GOT IT.
“I believe that we have to ban assault weapons in the state of Georgia,” Abrams finally said.
THEEERE WE GO.
Ok. So HERE’s where I’m confused. What does she think of THESE?
Members of the Black Panther Party marched through the city of Atlanta, strapped with assault rifles and brandishing Stacey Abrams campaign signs. https://t.co/9VzgQc1v2C
— Western Journal (@WestJournalism) November 4, 2018
Does she want to confiscate THEIR guns, too?
— Laura Ingraham (@IngrahamAngle) November 5, 2018
I mean… if you can call this a “march” …but whatever.
— K Ham (@keithfhamilton) November 4, 2018
So the question stands. How does Stacey Abrams feel about these guns?
Will she be the one to take them?
Or is she only after the guns of her political opponents?