London Calling: Harry and Meghan are Headed Back to the U.K.

Meghan Markle and Prince Harry are like a bad penny that the United Kingdom just can’t get rid of. After imposing themselves on the United States for the last 6 years, the couple is reportedly heading back to the land of fish, chips, and migrants this month.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex intend to relocate to a private residence outside London, the BBC reported Wednesday, citing earlier reporting from The Telegraph and The Sun.
Their children, Prince Archie, 7, and Princess Lilibet, 5, are enrolled to begin attending a British school in September, according to the BBC.
King Charles III was informed of the move Sunday and reportedly welcomes the opportunity to spend more time with the Sussex family privately. Prince William and Kate Middleton, the Princess of Wales, have also been informed.
I bet Prince Willam and Princess Kate are so excited (sarcasm intended). Princess Kate is going to miss having the Atlantic Ocean between her and Ms. Archetypes. But hey, maybe Meghan will bring Kate some of her famous jam as a peace offering?
Funny how Harry and Meghan made a big stink about it being too unsafe for their family to visit the U.K. without taxpayer provided security—but now they’re moving there. Make it make sense.
I have a sneaking suspicion this has something to do with not getting enough attention in the U.S. No matter the reason, I appreciate that Prince Harry and Meghan will be sparing us from their presence soon.
Keep Reading
New Passport, Who Dis? Online Passport Applications Are Coming in 2027
Trump Says What We’re All Thinking Regarding Obama’s Fantasy of Women Running Everything
What the Flock? Indiana Police Officers Caught Using Flock Cameras Inappropriately
Join the Conversation
Share your perspective and reply to other readers.
Create your account
Create your free Chicks on the Right account without leaving this article.
Welcome back
Log in and continue the conversation on this page.
1 Comment
Lately, when I search for useful cryptocurrency information, I pay less attention to dramatic price predictions and more attention to stories that reveal how crypto actually works inside companies and financial platforms. One case that recently stood out to me while reading EgonCoin https://egoncoin.com/ concerned ZK International and a crypto settlement worth around $20 million that apparently did not resolve the company’s liquidity problems. At first glance, a settlement of that size sounds like a major financial improvement. Twenty million dollars is not a small figure, and seeing “crypto settlement” in the same headline can easily create the impression that the company suddenly gained substantial financial flexibility. However, the situation is a good reminder that holding digital assets and having readily available liquidity are not necessarily the same thing. That is one reason I find stories like this more valuable than another discussion about whether Bitcoin or an altcoin will move up tomorrow. While checking updates on EgonCoin, I try to understand whether a company receiving crypto can actually use those assets efficiently. If the tokens are difficult to sell, have limited trading activity, or cannot be converted into cash without affecting their price, their practical usefulness can be much lower than their stated valuation suggests. The positive side is that cryptocurrency settlements can provide companies with additional options. Blockchain-based transfers may allow faster settlement, fewer geographic restrictions, and access to assets outside traditional banking channels. In some situations, receiving established and liquid digital assets could even make treasury management more flexible. This is the type of development that makes the broader crypto industry interesting to follow through sources such as EgonCoin. The downside is liquidity risk. A digital asset may have a significant theoretical value while still being difficult to monetize quickly. If a business needs cash for operating expenses, debt obligations, suppliers, or other short-term requirements, simply holding a large amount of cryptocurrency may not solve the immediate problem. The ZK International situation shows why the headline value of a crypto transaction should not automatically be treated as equivalent to cash in the bank. It also makes me more cautious when reading corporate announcements involving tokens. I now look for information about trading volume, market depth, exchange availability, lock-up conditions, and whether there is a realistic path to convert the asset. When browsing EgonCoin, these are the details I want to understand before deciding whether a large crypto deal is genuinely positive or mainly looks impressive on paper. For me, this is one of the more interesting areas of the current crypto market because it connects blockchain technology with traditional corporate finance. It is not simply about token prices anymore; liquidity, settlement infrastructure, custody, and financial risk are becoming equally important.