Megyn Kelly Has A Warning For Tom Brokaw’s Supporters…

Let me make sure I’m understanding this correctly, because I’m having a hard time keeping up with the #MeToo rules.

ALL women should be believed when they accuse any man of sexual assault/harassment/annoyance.

This is because men are all inherently rapists due to patriarchal rape culture.

That is, of course, unless prominent members of the media LIKE this man. In which case, the woman’s just an attention-hungry “bimbo” (Hillary’s words, not mine.)

Do I have that right?

Tom Brokaw has been accused of sexual harassment. The liberal elite is rallying by him… But Megyn Kelly has a word of warning:

“you don’t know what you don’t know.”

Not a huge fan of hers… but she’s certainly not wrong.

According to this:

Megyn Kelly has warned the more than 60 current and former female NBC News staffers who are defending Tom Brokaw that ‘you don’t know what you don’t know’.

Kelly was referring to Rachel Maddow, Maria Shriver, Andrea Mitchell, Mika Brzezinski, among others, who have signed a group letter supporting the veteran TV anchor in the wake of recent sexual misconduct allegations.

She made the remark on Monday during Megyn Kelly Today when NBC News’ national correspondent Kate Snow brought up the letter.

‘It’s basically a character reference,’ Kelly said. ‘And they’re saying, “For what it’s worth, my experience with him has always been honorable, and he’s always treated me well.”‘

‘And I understand that because when you love the person being under attack, you want to say, “This has been my experience,”‘ she added.

The letter defending Brokaw was released on Friday in response to claims that he made unwanted advances on two women in the 1990s, which the newsman has denied.

Megyn also brought up her own experience with at Roger Ailes at Fox News:

Kelly, who accused Ailes of sexual harassment, said: ‘I will say that the same thing did happen at Fox.’

She was referring to those individuals who defended Ailes after he was forced to resign in July 2016.

‘And the truth is, you don’t know what you don’t know. And that’s not in any way to impugn Tom, who I love and who’s been so good to me. Just saying, you don’t know what you don’t know,’ said Kelly during the show.

Kelly went on to say that she feels like letters of support ‘can be dicey’.

Again… not a fan. But I don’t think she’s wrong.

Why do people get to decide who to believe based on who they like?

Do you think these people gave anyone over at Fox the same consideration?

SHOULDN’T EVERYONE FACE THE SAME STANDARD?

She even took a jab at Hillary:

“Back during the presidential race, Hillary Clinton came out and said, ‘I believe every accuser should be believed’ … except those accusing her husband.”

Because you ONLY believe accusers of people you hate. It’s that simple.