Remember how Hillary took more than a week to say she was SHOOOOCKED about the Weinstein thing?
Why do we know it’s complete and total bull?
Because even her fangirl Lena Dunham says it is. She WARNED Hillary’s people about it.
The NYT has yet another exposé on the man who started it all… and Hillary totally gets mowed down.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) December 6, 2017
Not only did she keep cashing his checks… she even wanted to work with him on a documentary.
Among the revelations in the new @nytimes piece on Weinstein: @lenadunham says she tried to warn the Clinton campaign about Weinstein. Report also says the Clintons had dinner at Rao’s with Weinstein/Boies days after election defeat to discuss possible campaign documentary.
— Gabrielle Birkner (@GabiBirkner) December 6, 2017
Let’s be real. It’s not like we NEEDED this proof she already knew… it was pretty obvious… but now it’s completely undeniable.
“‘Warn’ the Clinton campaign??”
Why would anyone think Bill Clinton wouldn’t be fully aware of everything he ever needed to know about Weinstein? Do y’all even remember the ’90s?
— JCC-1701-D (@CorporaCallosa) December 6, 2017
Clinton’s response, “So is Bill, show me the money!”
— ProudDemExit (@dhartmann23) December 6, 2017
OBVIOUSLY Lena Dunham is just a Trump bot working with the Russians… right?
Hillary’s communications director TOTALLY denies the claim:
Not only did the Clinton campaign flatly deny Lena Dunham and Tina Brown warned them about Harvey Weinstein, Clinton aides also took a swipe at Dunham https://t.co/9wFQyZei3d pic.twitter.com/CXrprVSLu3
— Kia Makarechi (@Kia_Mak) December 6, 2017
So either way… someone’s lying out of their lier lie hole. (They’re probably both lying. Both are incapable of telling the truth.)
…and I have a feeling Lena and Hillz won’t be getting together for tea and crumpets any time soon.
AAAAAHHH! The sweet, sweet glory of the left eating their own.
Feel it radiate off your skin! It’s better than sunshine!