Dianne Feinstein Doesn’t Want Neil Gorsuch On The Supreme Court, Because Witchcraft Or Something…

WASHINGTON, DC - MARCH 20: Judge Neil Gorsuch arrives for the first day of his Supreme Court confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee in the Hart Senate Office Building on Capitol Hill March 20, 2017 in Washington, DC. Gorsuch was nominated by President Donald Trump to fill the vacancy left on the court by the February 2016 death of Associate Justice Antonin Scalia. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Miss CJ

I’m certainly not one to call the game a win when we’re barely into the first quarter (so to speak). But if this is the best argument the Democrats have against putting Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court, I think it’s safe to say that we’ll be addressing SCOTUS Justice Gorsuch soon enough.

The confirmation hearings for Judge Gorsuch are currently underway and the Democrats have brought in their heavy-hitters. By which I mean the typical clowns with their BS arguments that regular Americans are no longer buying. But that doesn’t mean the Democrats won’t still try, bless their ignorant hearts.

For example, their latest sterling example of wit and political acumen Senator Dianne Feinstein brought up Gorsuch’s record of judging cases with originalist Constitutional interpretation. And that’s BAAAAAAAAAD because, as Feinstein put it, merely a century before the Constitution was written, people were burning women at the stake for witchcraft.

No, for real. That’s what she said –

So… do we need to add “burning witches” next to the list of things Democrats pretend is in the Constitution, but really aren’t? Like the right to healthcare and abortion and changing the law based on technology?

History is clearly not Feinstein’s strong suit. British colonies weren’t officially established until well after the Salem Witch Trials.

Good grief, woman. How stupid can you get?

(Oh right – she was elected to represent California. That explains a few things.)

(h/t Twitchy)